Exactly how many of these possibly polyandrous unions was in fact truly polyandrous? The best hint originates from the initial membership build in the Mende Pattu. Desk 2 shows that 25 % of potentially polyandrous aunt organizations inside area was in fact indeed entered as such. We really do not know whether or not they was in fact uniform in this notation over the region. In fact, one of the first 2,five hundred (of 10,076 joined persons), maybe not one polyandrous relationship try filed, even though there had been a good amount of prospective ones. When we skip those basic 2,five hundred records, the fresh new display away from registered polyandrous brothers increases to thirty-two%. The fresh Mende thombos plus make clear you to, in reality, fraternal polyandry regarding one or two brothers is brand new dominating pattern. Within one to situation out of 102, we find about three brothers sharing neden rusГ§a kД±zlar sД±cak a wife. However, besides 102 aunt times, we find nine cases of cousins or other kin combinations. This means you to 8.0% from adult males and you can 5.5% away from mature feminine lived in some sort of polyandry within city. 6% (Letter = 2,094) and eight.2% (N = step 1,528). Somewhat puzzling ‘s the mentioning away from brothers-in-legislation otherwise sons-in-rules of head discussing a spouse. I’ve perhaps not incorporated all of them on dining table, while we don’t know whether they was brothers to each other.
We do not understand as to why the latest thombo authorities inside region made a decision to register polyandry, this provides some kind of legitimacy so you can a relationship that contravened most of the Dutch legislation
The first thombo subscription in the Galle even offers a different sort of possibility to estimate polyandry by the looking at mature brothers indeed sharing a home. Table 2 means that 50 % of brand new potentially polyandrous brothers in the Galle province from inside the 1695/6 resided to one another in the same dwelling. The new Galle thombos and – distinctively – explore attendance out of students on Protestant universities. Footnote 65 When we examine school attendance out-of pupils out-of family members that have polyandrous unions to people in the place of eg unions we see zero difference: 17% of your own boys went along to college or university into the low-polyandrous group (N = step one,630 boys), and also have 17% away from boys inside the polyandrous family (N = 166). The fresh figures on the girls is actually, correspondingly eight% (Letter = step one,241) and you may 6% (Letter = 98). Footnote 66 We can finish you to polyandry don’t prevent baptism neither school attendance, and this, however, the schoolmasters did not reject youngsters from ‘immoral’ family members.
Footnote 64 Whenever we dispose of the original 2,500 facts without proof of polyandry, we arrive at correspondingly ten
How much does all of this inform us concerning the total incidence of polyandry? We could safely think that in the a-quarter to help you 50 % of most of the probably polyandrous brothers was in fact surviving in a great polyandrous relationship. We can now proceed to a great recalculation regarding Dining table 2. Within the Galle inside 1695/six potentially polyandrous unions could well be utilized in twenty two.6% of family unit members teams. It fee are going to be recalculated to be polyandrous unions inside the 5.7–11.3% off members of the family teams (25–50% out-of 22.6). In the Mende into the 1760 we already know it is eleven.3% (or 18% in the event your basic 2,500 info was deal); into the Udugaha when you look at the 1760 it’s lower than 15–30%, plus Negombo it is only dos.7–5.3%. Ergo, from inside the Dutch period, polyandry are very common on the Lowlands, particularly in brand new rural portion bordering to the Kandy. It is indeed less common in the quick coastal nations which was not as much as colonial determine the longest. We can get a hold of this regarding port regarding Negombo of course, and regarding the Galle area. Right here, eight.6% off household lifestyle directly on the new shore (N = 237) contained polyandrous unions rather than a dozen.1% out of family members in the interior communities (= 576). It, however, does not necessarily suggest this was a bearing off colonial policy otherwise social influence. Coastal groups was basically have a tendency to engaged in additional jobs, in contrast to the hinterlands in which subsistence agriculture is prevalent. Additionally, otherwise after that, (caste) class was basically some other such regions as well. Both are you can easily symptoms you to definitely different ways regarding way of living was basically already expose between littoral and you can inland communities having an extended time of time, Footnote 67 and extra establish one to polyandry was primarily introduce between agricultural parents.
Lascia un commento